We don’t support this browser anymore.
This means our website may not look and work as you would expect. Read more about browsers and how to update them here.

 HL Select UK Growth Shares - Q2 2024 Review

HL SELECT UK GROWTH SHARES

HL Select UK Growth Shares - Q2 2024 Review

Managers' thoughts

Important information - The value of this fund can still fall so you could get back less than you invested, especially over the short term. The information shown is not personal advice and the information about individual companies represents our view as managers of the fund. It is not a personal recommendation to invest in a particular company. If you are at all unsure of the suitability of an investment for your circumstances please contact us for personal advice. The HL Select Funds are managed by our sister company HL Fund Managers Ltd.
James Jamieson

James Jamieson - Fund Manager

5 August 2024

Market review

The UK stock market delivered positive returns of 3.7% over the quarter, despite the unexpected announcement of a general election halfway through the period. The result duly arrived just after the quarter end and held few surprises overall, given the state of polling throughout the campaign.

Politics aside, the markets were influenced by the ongoing debate about whether interest rates would fall and if so when, and by how much. The Bank of England draws on economic evidence when it makes these decisions and so far, the evidence is mixed. Inflation has at least returned to the 2.0% target level, far below the 2022 peak of 11.1%. However, the devil, as always, lies in the detail. Goods prices are currently falling, by 1.3% p.a. at the last count, but Services price inflation is still some 5.7%, having only just rolled over from its peak rate. This twin-speed economy does not make the Bank of England’s decision any easier. So far it is sticking in the pack of other major central banks and not budging.

The best returns amongst the major sectors came from Health Care and Financials (notably the Banks), whilst Utilities and Consumer Discretionary were the laggards. Weakness in the Utilities was prompted by a surprise rights issue from National Grid which caused contagion across the sector about future funding needs. This came at a time when concerns about tighter regulation and possible financial penalties for Water companies with poor pollution outcomes were already unsettling investors.

Sherlock Holmes explained his solving of The Hound of the Baskervilles by highlighting that the dog had not barked in the night. This last quarter was remarkable too for the lack of barking. For much happened that could easily have worried markets. France has entered a period of intense political instability, dependent upon coalitions between parties who would typically cross the road to avoid exchanging pleasantries. France matters because it lies at the heart of the EU, our most important trading partner. The EU’s own elections showed a shift toward the right, which of course prompted the French poll. The Israel/Hamas conflict is still hot and capable of spreading, with exchanges between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon seemingly picking up. Meanwhile Ukraine and Russia seem a long way away from any sort of accord.

There are signs of slowing in the US economy. At the moment the market is taking the view that this matters not, if it gets worse the Fed will simply cut rates and off we go. Markets have not traditionally treated slowdowns, let alone recessions, with equanimity. Why should this time be different? Perhaps the most curious incident of all is the incredibly narrow leadership of global markets. A small number of AI-driven stocks are leading Wall Street and Wall Street is leading the world. At some point AI has to be seen to be powering the performance of those who adopt it.

Fund review

The fund delivered a total return of 3.0% over the quarter. The portfolio is tilted toward areas like technology and companies with digital business models in other sectors, like RELX and Experian. During the quarter, within the overall sector movements there was a rotation by investors in favour of more traditional, Value-driven sectors like Banks.

Our style is to favour those businesses that we believe can keep compounding their earnings far into the future. These growth stocks are rarely found on low ratings, so when markets become value-conscious our portfolio can face headwinds. Our approach is not to shift course, but just concentrate on reviewing the businesses we hold to ensure they still have that potential to compound out into the future because for us, long-lasting growth is the best driver of value.

01/07/2019 to 30/06/2020 01/07/2020 to 30/06/2021 01/07/2021 to 30/06/2022 01/07/2022 to 30/06/2023 01/07/2023 to 30/06/2024
HL Select UK Growth Shares A Acc -1.1% 16.0% -8.5% 6.9% 11.6%
FTSE All Share TR GBP -13.0% 21.5% 1.6% 7.9% 13.0%
IA UK All Companies -11.0% 27.4% -8.6% 6.1% 12.7%

Past performance isn’t a guide to the future. Source: Morningstar Direct to 30/06/24.

Stocks review

The winners

AstraZeneca rose by 15.7% over the quarter and because we have a substantial position, this added 1.0% to the fund’s value in its own right. As mentioned above, the group delivered an encouraging update mid-quarter that underlined the strength of their portfolio of drugs and the potential for their research pipeline to deliver future growth.

HSBC saw the announcement that its CEO, Noel Quinn had decided to step down after four years in the role. The market also learned that a major Chinese shareholder, the Ping An insurance group was looking to reduce its stake in HSBC. Those two events might have been enough to tip the stock lower, but the bank delivered a solid set of Q1 results which provided reassurance that underlying progress is good.

Shell’s stock price is often batted around by global energy prices. In Q2 these were pretty neutral, with a small rally in oil offset by weaker gas prices and refining margins. But Shell reported a very strong first quarter, which showed the group firing on all cylinders, including the all-important cash generation metric. The Group observed that oil demand, aviation fuel aside, is now above pre-pandemic levels. This underlines the energy transition challenges the world faces. For all the growth in renewables, demand for hydrocarbon fuels continues to rise regardless.

RELX enjoyed a strong quarter, returning almost 8%, but with few obvious catalysts for the move. Perhaps the market is better appreciating the group’s ability to increase the value it can offer through adding AI functionality to its data-driven offerings in areas from risk management to academia?

Auto Trader had been a laggard in Q1 suggesting market expectations were low, so when they came out with an encouraging set of full year results during Q2 there was plenty of scope for a bounce, which the stock duly delivered. AutoTrader are developing DealBuilder, which will allow car buyers to complete far more of their purchase journey online. We think the market is starting to recognise the higher potential value that Auto Trader will be able to bring to their customers, and what that might do for their already strong pricing power.

Gain/loss (%) Contribution to fund value (%)
AstraZeneca 15.7% 1.0%
HSBC 14.5% 0.7%
Shell 9.0% 0.6%
RELX 7.6% 0.4%
Auto Trader 14.4% 0.4%

Past performance isn’t a guide to the future. Source: Bloomberg 29/03/2024 to 28/06/2024.

The losers

Diageo continues to suffer from weak sentiment following its surprise downgrade due to Caribbean and Latin America weakness a few quarters ago. Indeed the group continues to be dogged by weak Tequila demand and their seems little evidence of any re-stocking by their wholesale customers. Market forecasts continue to drift lower, keeping Diageo under a cloud. But Johnny Walker keeps on walking. In our eyes, Diageo’s portfolio of brands remains hugely valuable and its cash generation capability is undiminished so we remain committed investors.

Ryanair has suffered turbulence, but remains airworthy to us. We have been surprised and a little disappointed to see the company’s expectations for fare growth trimmed repeatedly. Capacity in the airline sector was thought to be quite tight, which would normally translate through to firm pricing. In that environment we had thought that Ryanair’s structural advantages as the lowest cost, largest scale operator in European aviation would stand it well. Instead it appears that consumers are calling time on rising air fares. To us Ryanair remains the best-placed operator and periods like these have tended to play out in its favour eventually by discouraging the more marginal players from adding to capacity. For now though, the flight is looking a little choppy.

Compass looks to be doing things right, but the stock is rated for growth when Value is in favour. That seems to be holding the share back. But fundamentally, Compass is delivering, all regions grew revenues by double-digits in their half-year results released a little while ago and returns on capital of 19% are not to be sniffed at, let alone the 16% hike in the interim dividend. To be fair, the stock had been a top performer in the previous quarter and to us, this feels like little more than travelling and arriving.

Croda. In large families Mum and Dad love all their children equally, but every so often, one of them brings home a string of less than perfect school reports. And they love them all equally still. Croda’s reports have been, well, less than glowing of late. Croda are not the only chemicals business to be having a tough time, but maybe the others have been concentrating in class just a little bit more. Their Q1 report was OK on the revenue line, still falling versus a year ago, but better in absolute terms than the previous quarter. Management even talked of green shoots appearing. But overall, recovery is proving slower than hoped. And it is clear that everything has to fall into place, before we start to see the sort of margin improvements that we had hoped for. Longer term though, the dynamics of Croda’s business, especially their Consumer Care division, which supplies the high-value active ingredients to cosmetic manufacturers and others, are hugely attractive.

AutoDesk dropped by 5% in the quarter. They had quite a torrid time where they announced a delay to publishing their annual report, due to an internal investigation into their own accounting practices. US stock exchange rules allow for extensions in these circumstances, but they then missed the extended publication date. The stock fell by as much as 25% in the ensuing weeks. Finally, Autodesk announced a few changes to their approach to accounting for business going forward and moved the finance director to a new Strategy role and the stock recovered most of the lost ground, not least because Q1 trading had been strong. This is not the first time we have seen companies admit to showing a rose-tinted view of performance, nor will it be the last. Market shares and competitive advantages have not changed, nor is the group’s customer base diminished. But Autodesk have damaged their reputation and the market will likely treat them with a degree of circumspection for a while to come.

Gain/loss (%) Contribution to fund (%)
Diageo -14.9% -0.4%
Ryanair -20.1% -0.4%
Compass -6.3% -0.3%
Croda -18.4% -0.2%
Autodesk -5.1% -0.2%

Past performance isn’t a guide to the future. Source: Bloomberg 29/03/2024 to 28/06/2024.

The outlook

The UK election has seen Labour swept in with a huge majority, even though their share of the vote was little changed. In France, at the time of writing, no-one is quite sure who the government will be. In the wider EU elections, voters moved to the right, but not decisively so far. Whilst over in the States a rising clamour was calling for President Biden to step down from the Democratic nomination, now confirmed in the later part of July.

The new UK government said little of substance before the election, proving the old adage that Oppositions do not win elections. Instead, Governments lose them. However, Labour has said that core tax bands and rates will not be changed. If they have plans to raise significant amounts, they are yet to share them. That ought to help keep consumer confidence up, although the ongoing impact of mortgage refinancing will continue to hurt for a while longer.

We have seen some less than encouraging data on jobs, not least a recent trading update from Page Group, the employment agency that talked of lower rates of hiring in pretty much every major economy. Central banks seem to want to know that inflation is firmly buried before they cut rates. Market expectations are now only for limited cuts later this year. The UK and other major Global economies have done well to get through all that has been thrown at them in recent years. Neither surging interest rates, pandemics, energy price shocks, nor wars in the Middle East and Ukraine have led to recessions. The unpredictable lags of monetary policy means these could still come. But central banks have regained their armory now that interest rates are high. We don’t know for sure when interest rates will fall, or by how much. But over the next year or two we do expect them to fall and for bond yields to move lower in response. That suggests we need to embrace a little more sensitivity to lower rates.

Over the quarter we bought into Kainos, Tritax Big Box and National Grid which ought to be well suited to the environment ahead (see website for detail). We funded these new positions through the disposal of Unilever. Its defensiveness has served us well at times of stress in markets, but the group is still struggling to get its portfolio of brands firing on all cylinders. One of our concerns is the degree to which Unilever and other major branded goods companies have pushed pricing ahead in recent years, making some of these companies potentially less resilient in years ahead.

Globally, markets have been led higher by leading AI players, like Nvidia in the USA, which briefly became the world’s most valuable company in late June. The UK is relatively unexposed to physical AI technology production, but we are an extremely IP-driven economy. AI will impact us via how businesses that operate or are listed in the UK, deploy the technology as it becomes available to them. It seems reasonable to us to think that those who run efficient businesses that effectively use Intellectual Property to create value for their shareholders are likely to be better at deploying this new technology than those who do not.

Important - This article is not advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any investment. No view is given on the present or future value or price of any investment, and investors should form their own view on any proposed investment. This article has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is considered a marketing communication. Non-independent research is not subject to FCA rules prohibiting dealing ahead of research, however HL has put controls in place (including dealing restrictions, physical and information barriers) to manage potential conflicts of interest presented by such dealing. Please see our full non-independent research for more information. Unless otherwise stated performance figures are from Bloomberg and estimates, including prospective yields, are a consensus of analyst forecasts from Bloomberg. They are not a reliable indicator of future performance. Yields are variable and not guaranteed.