Share your thoughts on our News & Insights section. Complete our survey to help us improve.

Investment trust research and insight

JPM Global Growth and Income trust: November 2024 update

In this update, Investment Analyst Aidan Moyle shares our analysis on the manager, process, culture, ESG, cost, and performance of the JPMorgan Global Growth and Income Investment Trust.
jp morgan logo

Important information - This article isn’t personal advice. If you’re not sure whether an investment is right for you please seek advice. If you choose to invest the value of your investment will rise and fall, so you could get back less than you put in.

Prices delayed by at least 15 minutes
  • A well-resourced team with analyst coverage in all corners of the market

  • The trusts utilises a unique way of paying dividends, committing to 4% dividends based off the trust's net asset value (NAV) from the prior financial year end

  • The trust has performed well since the managers took over the running of it in April 2019

How it fits in a portfolio

The JPMorgan Global Growth and Income trust aims to grow capital over the longer term by investing in companies from around the globe. The managers can invest anywhere in the world including higher-risk emerging markets, but they tend to invest more in developed regions like the US and Europe. Tapping into all corners of the market, the trust could add diversification to a portfolio focused on a single market or as a building block in a global portfolio.

Investors in closed-ended funds should be aware the trust can trade at a discount or premium to the net asset value (NAV).

Manager

The team is headed up by Helge Skibeli. Skibeli has over 30 years’ experience and has been at JP Morgan since 1990, where he is a managing director and a portfolio manager within the International Equity team. He is located in London. He was previously CIO of the International Equities Research Driven Team and before that the Global Head of Developed Market Equity Research. Skibeli is also named co-manager on numerous other JP Morgan Global Equity strategies.

He’s supported by another two portfolio managers Tim Woodhouse and James Cook. Woodhouse, who is located in New York, has over 15 years’ experience and joined JP Morgan as a graduate trainee. He was previously a research analyst in the technology, media, and telecoms sectors before becoming a portfolio manager. Cook, who is located in London, is the newest member of the team having joined in 2019. He was also a graduate trainee when he joined in 2007. Before joining the international equity team he was a research analyst covering financials and worked as a portfolio manager on the Global Financials Fund.

Process

Skibeli and the team aim to build a global equity portfolio of high conviction stocks. The portfolio is comprised of bottom-up stock picking based on the analyst team’s best ideas. The team focus on ideas where the companies are attractively valued and growing their earnings faster than their peers.

To identify opportunities, the managers utilise their in-house analyst team to carry out the fundamental company research. The analysts are located all over the world and often communicate with analysts in other regions that cover different companies within the same industries, so that they get a wider perspective on certain companies and their industries. There is a focus on mid to long-term earnings and cashflows when assessing an individual company. They cover around 2,500 companies across global stock markets.

When building the portfolio, Skibeli is focused on building a high conviction portfolio that typically comprises of 50-90 stocks. He draws on the fundamental research done by the analysts as a starting universe however, focusses on three key criterias. A stock must have significant upside potential, these names also typically avoid large share price falls. The team must have clear insight; they understand why the companies are different to competitors in the space and what gives that company the edge to outgrow peers. Finally, the managers focus on high-quality companies who have resilient balance sheets that trade at attractive valuations.

The managers also commit to paying a dividend. Their current intention is to pay dividends totalling 4% based off the trust’s net asset value at the end of the trust’s prior financial year. They achieve this by distributing the dividends that are received from their investments. If dividends received are below the amount needed to pay a 4% dividend for the trust, the trust will use capital growth to fund the remainder of the dividend. This is a feature of investment trusts that isn’t available to open-ended funds. This means the trust’s board of directors can covert some of the trust’s capital growth into income to top up the dividends. Paying dividends out of capital means the trust will have to sell some assets in order to fund the income, meaning the NAV will fall. If the trust does not have enough capital growth to top up the dividends it may be unable to meet its commitment.

Over the trust’s last financial year, the biggest changes to the portfolio were the changes to their sector exposure. Their technology exposure increased, mainly in the semiconductor and hardware space. The funds consumer staples exposure also increased. On the other hand, the managers reduced their exposure to banks and pharmaceutical companies. The managers also made some minor changes to their region exposure. The US still makes up the vast majority of the portfolio however, the managers have sold all of their investments in China, Hong Kong, Canada and Sweden over the year.

Over the last 12 months the managers still continue to see attractive opportunities. The key opportunities that they are seeing are in defensive sectors where valuations look attractive and in some higher growth areas such as those exposed to the manufacturing of semiconductors.

This has led to the team buying Korean semiconductor company SK Hynix a leader in edge memory services. They also have a positive view of the transition in the US to renewable energy and suppliers of aircraft components. They therefore bought US renewable company Southern Company and French aerospace company Airbus. They also initiated a position in Swiss food and beverage company Nestle and Dutch beverage company Heineken.

In order to fund these new investments, the managers also sold a number of companies. US insurance company Progressive was sold as well as Swiss insurance group Zurich Reinsurance. Both had been beneficiaries of the elevated interest rate environment and although they are high quality franchises, their valuations are now high and there were better options elsewhere.

The managers also use gearing (borrowing to invest), which can improve gains but also increases losses, which makes it a higher-risk approach. Gearing currently stands at 0.1% a marginal decrease from last year were gearing stood at 0.4%. This remains below their limit of 20%. They also have the flexibility to use derivatives, which if used, adds risk. Potential investors should refer to the latest annual reports and accounts for details of the risks and charging structure.

Culture

JP Morgan is one of the world's biggest asset managers. It has investment professionals based all over the world, and the team behind this fund can tap into this experience and local knowledge. The group is home to a strong global offering and the team is stable, with low turnover among senior members.

ESG integration

JP Morgan committed to integrate Environmental Social Governance (ESG) factors into their investment processes for active funds in 2016 and ESG is now a foundation for investment decisions across the firm. JP Morgan funds take a variety of different approaches, from quantitively scoring companies on a variety of ESG measures to help with portfolio construction, to more qualitative analysis achieved through fundamental research and company meetings. All fund managers have access to the central Sustainable Investing team, as well as thematic research and analytics, which focus on climate change and carbon transition.

Investment teams are required to demonstrate their progress on integrating ESG to a working group of senior managers from across the business and the Sustainable Investing team. Their progress is measured against a 10-point scoring system and must satisfy several conditions before it can achieve ‘ESG accredited’ status. If the strategy does not meet this threshold, the investment team in question will need to incorporate the feedback from the working group and reapply to restart the review process. Once approved, teams must seek recertification every three years, and are subject to ongoing monitoring. We like this objective approach to internal ESG accreditation.

The firm has detailed voting policies which are specific to each region they invest in and account for local customs. Investment teams and investment stewardship specialists in the relevant region are responsible for implementing those policies, based on their deep knowledge and experience of the country, sector and company. A detailed fund-by-fund and company-by-company voting record is available on the JP Morgan website, although voting rationale is not provided. Fund managers also regularly engage with the companies they invest in, and there are a number of case studies on their website and in their annual Investment Stewardship report.

In February 2024, J.P. Morgan Asset Management controversially withdrew from the Climate Action 100+ collaborative engagement initiative, citing that it had built up its own stewardship capabilities. Following a recent meeting with the firm’s Global Head of Sustainable Investing, we are confident that it remains firmly committed to sustainability

Although the managers integrate sustainability and ESG into their investment process, it is not a sustainable fund.

Cost

The ongoing annual charge over the trust’s financial year to 30 June 2024 was 0.43%. This is a rise from 0.22% last year. The increase is due to the conclusion of the management fee waiver that was in place last year as the fund merged with Scottish Investment Trust.

However, in January 2024 the trust also merged with JPM Multi-Asset Growth & Income Trust. Therefore, the ongoing charge this year also includes a management fee waiver in relation to that merger. Without any management fee waivers, the estimated ongoing charge is approximately 0.48%.

Investors should refer to the latest annual reports and accounts, and Key Information Document for details of the risks and charging structure. If held in a SIPP or ISA, the HL platform charge of 0.45% per annum (capped at £200 per annum for a SIPP and £45 for an ISA) also applies. The platform charge doesn’t apply if the trust is held in a Fund and Share Account.

Investment trusts trade like shares, both a buy and sell instruction will be subject to the HL share dealing charges.

Performance

The trust has provided strong returns since the managers took over in April 2019. The share price has increased113.88%* compared to 81.26% for the trusts benchmark the MSCI All Country World (MSCI ACWI) and 36.77% of the AIC Global Equity Income sector average. During this time the NAV has risen 116.01.%. Past performance is not a guide to the future though and investments fall as well as rise in value so you could get back less than you invest.

During the trust’s latest financial year to the end of June 2024 the share price rose 28.81% outperforming the MSCI ACWI which returned 20.61% as well the AIC Global Equity Income sector average which returned 13.40%. The trusts NAV also increased 28.01%.

The team’s investments in higher growth names performed especially well over the trust’s financial year. Semiconductor company’s Nvidia and TSMC performed strongly as their earnings grew off the back of strong demand for artificial intelligence. The team believe AI is still in early stages and there is a long pathway still ahead. Other contributors include several US company’s including communication service company Meta, consumer company Amazon and technology company Uber. Also Danish healthcare company Novo Nordisk also performed well as demand continued to increase for their obesity drug continue to grow.

On the other hand, not all stocks performed well. French luxury brand LVMH struggled as demand fell particular in China where consumers slowed down their spending as the economy slowed. Other notable detractors included Indian bank HDFC, French industrial company Vinci and US industrial company Deere & Co.

The trust currently trades at a premium of 1.3%. Since the managers took over in April 2019 the trust has traded on average of a 1.59% premium. The trust currently yields 3.11%, although yields are not an indication of future income and are not guaranteed.

Annual percentage growth

31/10/2019 To 31/10/2020

31/10/2020 To 31/10/2021

31/10/2021 To 31/10/2022

31/10/2022 To 31/10/2023

31/10/2023 To 31/10/2024

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income

6.50%

34.36%

0.02%

14.31%

26.68%

AIC Investment Trust - Global Equity Income

-9.17%

26.67%

-7.29%

-0.59%

25.29%

MSCI AC World TR GBP

5.50%

30.04%

-4.25%

5.37%

25.91%

Past performance isn't a guide to future returns.
Source: *Lipper IM to 31/10/2024.
Latest from Investment trust research and insight
Weekly Newsletter
Sign up for Fund insight. Receive expert fund insights direct to your inbox every week, including research, investment articles and in-depth sector reviews.
Written by
Aidan Moyle
Aidan Moyle
Investment Analyst

Aidan joined the Fund Research team in 2022 and is responsible for analysing funds and investment trusts in the US and Global Sectors. He has a keen interest in macroeconomics and in particular US monetary policies and the impact it can have on clients' investments.

Our content review process
The aim of Hargreaves Lansdown's financial content review process is to ensure accuracy, clarity, and comprehensiveness of all published materials
Article history
Published: 22nd November 2024